![]() ![]() Wouxun seems (and is claimed) to be a more rugged design. Simplicity gives the definite nod to the Wouxun. Less confusing (and yep, lessįunctional). ![]() GENOAK to disable the double PPT and sync the screen toĭisplay channel+name. Nice for some folks, confusing for others. And the dual-transmit PPT and split screen on the V1 is Keypad and with the dial for channel selection, is IMO a muchĮasier radio for an "average" person or neighborhood group to Role.) There's also ease of radio use and how well the radio Practically speaking, not going to make a huge difference, asĮvidenced by our testing. (claimed-I see about 3.5W on my SWR meter) Recommendation than missing features or some difference in ![]() ![]() In terms of features and cost, the V1 gets If a future version could include VHF monitoring, and he said I asked the president ofī (co-creator of the KG-805G) The ubiquitous AT1846S single-chip transceiver as does theīaoFengs and V1 (and many others), incorporating VHF Listen to ORCA's WB6NDJ 440 repeater frequency, giving theĪbility to hear (some) Ham radio communications in an Note that the Wouxun does receive-only UHFįrequencies 400-470 MHz, so can be programmed for example to Including NOAA weather, as the V1 has, is definitely usefulĪnd I wish the Wouxun had included that receive-onlyĬapability. Recommend the Wouxun KG-805G 1st, the BTECH V1 2nd. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |